Skip to main content
Alt-TAB
What people are saying

From people who've used Alt-TAB

Real experiences from builders, NGOs, startups, and community organisations who ran an assessment before deploying. Unedited, or lightly condensed with meaning kept intact.

49
Assessments completed
97%
Had serious gaps before deployment
5.7
Blindspots found per assessment on average
From users
It forces teams to be clear about the safety of their application. It takes the overwhelming task of regulatory compliance and responsible AI use and breaks it into small, digestible, manageable discussion points.
Alt-TAB user Beta testing, 2026
It helped me identify risks I hadn't previously considered. The explanations for each category were the most useful part — they gave me language to take the conversation to my board.
Alt-TAB user Beta testing, 2026
The tool is currently a risk diagnostic. The reports are becoming a navigator, telling you exactly how to fix things based on your specific role and development cycle. That would be highly helpful.
Alt-TAB user Beta testing, 2026
Share your own experience

If Alt-TAB surfaced something you hadn't considered, changed how you approached deployment, or gave you language to have a difficult conversation, we'd like to hear that, and with your permission, share it.

Aim for 2 to 4 sentences. What did you find? What did you do differently as a result?
You can be as specific or as anonymous as you like.
Submissions are reviewed before being published. We may lightly edit for length and clarity, with your meaning kept intact.

Thank you.

Your experience has been submitted for review. We'll be in touch if we have any questions.

Run another assessment  ·  Go back to the homepage